Connecting the Dots
Over the course of the past month and a half, the themes we
discussed have gradually built upon one another leading to a synonymous harmony
in our blog posts. Looking at the first post on our alias, I was tasked with
defining who Adam Smith was and the contributions he had on the thought processes
of economics. His concept of the invisible hand provides the backbone for
transfer pricing, the structure of organizations, and even what causes them to
make certain decisions as they are generally acting in their own self-interest.
While I know that not everyone had the chance to research Adam Smith, I am quite
sure the other economists that classmates wrote about had topics that tied in
as well. Writing about my experiences with organizations and tying in the concepts
we’ve learned in class has allowed me to view organizations in a different
light. I no longer perceive a business as it is, rather I delve deeper into how
they are structured and the reasons they behave the way they do. For example, I
used to look at the bar I work at on campus as a point of sale business where
students came to buy drinks then left. However, I am now able to view the
hierarchy of employees, the methods of management, and what actually drives the
business of the bar and allows it to prosper. The theme of Illinibucks could
also be compared to creating a more efficient organization. Efficiency can definitely
be tied in with opportunism and whether or not organizations take advantage of
situations to improve the fluidity and ease of transaction.
Furthermore, you could then questions what the transaction costs of the
opportunity would be and if it would impact the structure of the organization.
My writing process has definitely been improving over time,
however, due to the various styled prompts, I have struggled to dive in-depth on
some of the topics. My experience with organizations was very easy to talk
about as it was something that I had experienced first-hand throughout my life.
The words came naturally and flowed onto the paper and before I realized, I had
reached the 600-word limit. However, looking at the prompt of Illinibucks,
there were a lot of things that were up in the air. This prompt required you to
think more creatively on what kinds of things on campus could use an efficiency
improvement. However, after rethinking the concept of Illinibucks I believe that
they would not be the right decision as they do not cater to the entire population
that uses the amenities. I do think my writing style has become more scholarly than
it was before. I had never truly been exposed to economic writing before taking
this class as most of the pre-requisites and requirements for the economics
degree generally just included math and statistics.
In terms of actually writing the prompt, I do not really see anything
wrong with the approach you have been taking. I think they tie nicely into what
we have been talking about in class and the Excel homework we have been
completing. Transfer pricing was definitely the most obvious connection in
terms of Excel, lecture and prompt. However, I think a lot of students tend to forget
that you do not need to write about the prompt every week and can instead bring
up your own prompt that relates to a topic from class. I think advertising this
more would lead to a wide array of posts and would create a better environment
for discussion. If everyone came up with a topic to tie in we could treat lectures
as a discussion where everyone shared what they wrote about and why.
Let me clear up some confusion first. What we are doing with the blogging I would not call economics writing (such as what you'd write for publication in an Economics Journal) nor even the type of writing a professional economist would use when writing for a popular outlet, such as an opinion piece in the NY Times or the Wall Street Journal. Instead it is formative (early thinking) writing on the themes of the class. Elsewhere, this sort of thing has been referred to as writing to learn. I'm a proponent of that idea.
ReplyDeleteI didn't quite get the distinction you made about the bar where you work. I can see that the class made you reflect about how the work is structured, but I didn't see how that ruled out your earlier conception (which seemed to be based more on the demand side of the business). In any event, there does seem to be quite a distance between that work and transfer pricing work at Deloitte. Maybe the metaphors that the course provides should be taken less strongly so you can focus on differences between the jobs rather than put them both under one roof.
I will also encourage you to be careful in your language use. In your post, "synonymous harmony" caught my eye. It is not an expression that I use, so I Googled it and found a religious reference. Perhaps you can try to say what you mean using more straightforward language. It may seem that you seem more in the know with richer language use. I've found something of the opposite, however. My current approach to teaching I call - bring it down so you can bring it up. In other words, make your point as simply as possible at first. Then you can embellish on it.
Thanks for the reminder about writing other than to the prompt. In my comments on the connecting the dots post, I've encouraged several students to do that. It remains to be seen to see if they take up the suggestion.
Thank you for clearing up the confusion regarding the style of writing we were doing. I think in a sense, it was a misuse of language. Formative writing has been something that I have learned to enjoy through this class. It is a style I was not used to before enrolling and writing a few posts. However, I can now say that it is quite stimulating to think about topics in such a way and project your thoughts onto paper (or in this case - a screen).
DeleteIn terms about my reference back to the bar, I never deemed my previous understanding obsolete regarding the demand side. Rather, taking this class has broadened my perspective as to how the the business runs and operates and the various transaction costs that occur in the process.
As I said before, I will be more careful with the language I choose. I have always had an eye for poetic writing which leads me to write in such a way. Especially with the formative writing mindset I find it quite easy to let my fingers push the keys and make sense of things.
I will try in the future to come up with my own prompt. Perhaps in a few weeks since I am looking forward to writing my post that was due on Friday. I was quite busy last week and over the weekend with job interviews in Chicago. Luckily, I should no have to worry about doing any more interviews!